Long-term follow-up after angiographically successful coronary stenting: direct stent versus conventional stent implantation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of the study was to compare the impacts of angiographically successful direct stent implantation and conventional stent implantation (stent implantation following predilatation) on long-term major cardiac events. The authors prospectively studied 40 patients who had successful direct stent implantation and 46 patients who had successful conventional stent implantation. The end-point of the study was defined as the occurrence of a major cardiac event, including recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction, death, and target vessel revascularization. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study groups were similar, except the indication of percutaneous angioplasty, which was more frequently unstable angina in the conventional stent group (63% vs 38%, P: 0.03). Procedural minor complications were more frequent in conventional stent implantation, and there was also a positive correlation between the conventional stent implantation and procedural minor complications (r = 0.231, P: 0.03), and postprocedural troponin elevation (r = 0.221, P: 0.04). The incidences of major cardiac events including recurrent angina, acute myocardial infarction, death, death or myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization were not different between the study groups during the long-term follow-up period (21 +/- 7.1 months for direct stent group and 20 +/- 7.5 months for conventional stent group). Overall end-points occurred in 9 patients (22%) in the direct stent group and in 9 patients (19%) in the conventional stent group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no difference in event-free survival between the patients treated with direct stent implantation and conventional stent implantation (log-rank: 1.52, P = 0.21). Two-vessel intervention and hypertension were found to be related with long-term major cardiac events (r = 0.214, P: 0.048, r = 0.206, P: 0.04, respectively). In addition to the procedural advantages, direct stent implantation may also provide comparable results with conventional stent implantation concerning the late cardiac events following successful percutaneous coronary angioplasty.
منابع مشابه
Safety, Efficacy and Clinical Outcome of Direct Stent Implantation
Conventional methods of stenting require predilatation, which potentially increase vessel wall injury and cost of the procedure. In this study, the safety and efficacy of direct AVE-S7 (Medtronic-USA) stent placement were evaluated in 100 patients. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed at the baseline and post-stent. Clinical follow-up was done up to 9 months. In 100 patients (76 male...
متن کاملINTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND SURGERY Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation
Objective: To compare in a randomised trial the procedural and clinical outcome and long term patency of conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation versus direct stenting without predilatation. Methods: Patients undergoing coronary intervention for symptomatic coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to conventional angioplasty with optional stenting or to direct stent impl...
متن کاملClinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation.
OBJECTIVE To compare in a randomised trial the procedural and clinical outcome and long term patency of conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation versus direct stenting without predilatation. METHODS Patients undergoing coronary intervention for symptomatic coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to conventional angioplasty with optional stenting or to direct stent impl...
متن کاملIncidence, mechanism, predictors, and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition after bare-metal stent implantation.
BACKGROUND Predictors and long-term prognosis of late stent malapposition (LSM) after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS We evaluated the incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and long-term prognosis of LSM after BMS implantation in 881 patients (992 native lesions) in whom intravascular ultrasound was performed at index and 6-month follow-up. LSM was defined as...
متن کاملبررسی نتیجه کلینیکی بلند مدت آنژیوپلاستی با استنت فلزی در بیماران مبتلا به بیماری عروق کرونر در بیمارستان فاطمه زهرا (س) ساری از سال 1383 تا سال 1385
Background and Purpose:Coronary artery Stenting is known to improve the outcome for ischemic heart disease. Many clinical studies have been performed to determine the long-term outcome of coronary Stenting and most of them were based on first-generation bare-metal Stents. The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term (24 6.4 month) results of second-generation bare metal stent. Materials an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Japanese heart journal
دوره 45 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004